Megaliticsbeta

Recherche

Chercher un site, un artefact ou un dossier de l’atlas

Baalbek
No accepted answerSite

Baalbek

The trilithon: three 800-tonne blocks in a wall. In the quarry, the "Stone of the Pregnant Woman" weighs 1,000.

Location
Lebanon · Near East
Civilisation
Rome (podium debated)
Period
temple: 1st c. AD
Technique
Trilithon: 3 blocks of ~800 t
Studies

no explanation commands consensus to date. A revisable snapshot of the state of research, never a judgement.

→ Show on the map
In pictures

The elements of the site

8 photos · Wikimedia Commons
© Matson Collection · Public domain
© Matson Collection · Public domain
© Matson Collection · Public domain
© Matson Collection · Public domain
Location

Where the site is

34.010° N, 36.200° E · satellite view

🔬 Science

What science says

  • The Temple of Jupiter is a documented Roman construction project of the 1st century AD.

  • A block of about 1,500–1,650 t (the 'Forgotten Stone', uncovered in 2014 by the German mission) remained in the quarry: the Romans knew when to give up — a sign of a rational construction project.

  • The Romans commonly lifted loads on the order of 100 t (columns, architraves) with gin poles and capstans; beyond that, blocks were slid and rolled rather than lifted.

  • Three distinct stones remain in the quarry, in ascending order of mass: the Stone of the Pregnant Woman (Hajar al-Hibla, ~1,000 t), the Stone of the South (Hajar el-Guble, ~1,242 t, rediscovered in the 1990s), the Forgotten Stone (~1,500–1,650 t, discovered by the DAI in summer 2014). They are NOT part of the Trilithon.

  • The initial phase of Podium I (structure beneath the columns) shows Herodian characteristics (~15 BC) according to Kropp & Lohmann (Levant 43, 2011): masonry with drafted margins and header/stretcher alternation identical to the Temple Mount in Jerusalem. The Trilithon itself remains attributed to the imperial Roman phase.

  • Adam (Syria 54, 1977) calculates that a block of 557 t could have been transported by 512 men using rollers and capstans. The documented maximum capacity for Roman vertical lifting (towers + multi-machine capstans) is about 100 t (Adam, La construction romaine, 1984; Vitruvius, De Architectura X.2).

🜂 Mystery

What remains unexplained

this site echoes others

Parallels

Cyclopean masonry without mortar — a correlation of form, contexts with no known link.

Proposed — to be examined
themes & techniques

Related to

RomeExtreme liftingNear EastEarlier podiums?
every line can be checked

Studies & sources

ConsensusVitruvius Pollio, De Architectura, Liber X, cap. 2 (Polyspastos, machines de levage), ca. 25 av. J.-C. — éd. Rose 1899, trad. Morgan 1914↗ConsensusWiegand T. (éd.), Baalbek: Ergebnisse der Ausgrabungen und Untersuchungen in den Jahren 1898 bis 1905, 3 vol., Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 1921–1925↗Peer-reviewKropp A. J. M. & Lohmann D., 'Master, look at the size of those stones!' — Analogies in Construction Techniques Between the Temples at Heliopolis (Baalbek) and Jerusalem, Levant 43/1 (2011), pp. 38–50↗Peer-reviewKropp A. J. M., The cults of Ituraean Heliopolis (Baalbek), Journal of Roman Archaeology 23 (2010), pp. 221–252↗Peer-reviewLohmann D., Giant Strides towards Monumentality – The Architecture of the Jupiter Sanctuary in Baalbek/Heliopolis, Bollettino di Archeologia on line, vol. spécial, Poster Session 2, 2010 (ISSN 2039-0076)↗
Show 11 more sources
ConsensusLohmann D., Das Heiligtum des Jupiter Heliopolitanus in Baalbek. Die Planungs- und Baugeschichte, Orient-Archäologie 38, Verlag Marie Leidorf, Rahden, 2017 (ISBN 978-3-89646-668-6)↗Peer-reviewAbdul Massih J., The Megalithic Quarry of Baalbek: Sector III — the Megaliths of Ḥajjar al-Ḥibla, Journal of Eastern Mediterranean Archaeology and Heritage Studies 3/4 (2015), pp. 313–329↗Peer-reviewAdam J.-P., À propos du trilithon de Baalbek. Le transport et la mise en œuvre des mégalithes, Syria 54/1-2 (1977), pp. 31–63↗ConsensusAdam J.-P., La construction romaine — matériaux et techniques, Picard (Grands manuels Picard), Paris, 1984, 367 p.↗Peer-reviewRuprechtsberger E. M., Vom Steinbruch zum Jupitertempel von Heliopolis/Baalbek (Libanon), Linzer Archäologische Forschungen 30 (1999), pp. 7–56↗Peer-reviewFrausto da Silva F. et al., Archaeoastronomy and the Chronology of the Temple of Jupiter at Baalbek, preprint arXiv:1606.05888, 2016↗ConsensusDAI — découverte de la Forgotten Stone (Pierre oubliée, ~1 650 t), communiqué été 2014, relayé par Archaeology Magazine, 2 déc. 2014↗ConsensusDAI — découverte de la Forgotten Stone, relayé par Smithsonian Magazine, 2014↗ConsensusDAI — Projet Stadtforschungen in Baalbek/Heliopolis (2001–en cours), page officielle↗AnalyticalLow-Tech Magazine, The Sky is the Limit: Human Powered Cranes and Lifting Devices, 2010↗ContraryHeiser M. S., Transporting the Trilithon Stones of Baalbek: It's About Applied Physics, Not Ancient Aliens, 2015 (source contradictoire)↗
Discover

Keep exploring